Consumer goods companies and retailers need to be upfront about where palm oil in their products comes from to relieve consumers of the burden of making sustainable choices.<\/p>\n
That is a key finding of new research from the University of Cambridge (UK). It publishes today in Environmental Research Letters.<\/p>\n
Palm oil production causes deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions from peatland conversion, and biodiversity loss, but it is found in many products, often unbeknownst to consumers. It is a common ingredient in foods, body products, detergents, and biofuels.<\/p>\n
Dr Rosemary Ostfeld, from the University of Cambridge, is the study\u2019s lead author. She said: \u201cThe Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) has made efforts to improve the sustainability of palm oil production by creating an environmental certification system for palm oil.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut currently only 19% of palm oil is RSPO-certified. This means the majority that finds its way into products people buy daily is still produced using conventional practices.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe wanted to find out if consumers were actively seeking to make a sustainable choice about palm oil. We also explored what extra efforts governments could make to ensure sustainable palm oil consumption.\u201d<\/p>\n
The researchers surveyed 1,695 British consumers through the market research company YouGov.<\/p>\n
Respondents were asked about their awareness of palm oil and its environmental impact; their recognition of \u2018ecolabels\u2019 such as Fairtrade, the Soil Association, and RSPO; and which ecolabelled products they included in their weekly household shopping.<\/p>\n
They found UK consumer awareness of palm oil was high (77%), with 41% of those aware of it viewing it as \u2018environmentally unfriendly\u2019.
\nYet, almost no consumers were aware of the RSPO label that showed a product contained sustainably-produced palm oil.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn terms of label recognition versus action, 82% of people recognised the Fairtrade label, but only 29% actively buy Fairtrade products,\u201d said Dr Ostfeld.<\/p>\n
\u201cOnly 5% recognised the RSPO label \u2013 the same as a fictional label we put into the survey as a control. Of that small number, only one percent said they actively include products with the label in their shopping.\u201d<\/p>\n
The low recognition of the RSPO label could be due to the scarcity of its use by consumer goods companies and retailers.<\/p>\n
Dr Ostfeld suggested: \u201cThis may be due in part to reluctance to draw attention to their use of palm oil, or it may be because they fall short of the 95% physical certified palm oil content that used to be needed to use the label.<\/p>\n
\u201cEither way, we found that relying on consumers to consciously and regularly include certified products in their shopping has limitations. Our results show that even when consumer awareness of an ecolabel is high, action is not guaranteed.\u201d<\/p>\n
To address this problem, the researchers put forward several policy recommendations.<\/p>\n
Dr Ostfeld explained: \u201cPalm oil is more efficient to produce than other vegetable oils and plays a vital role in the livelihoods of millions of people, so banning it is not plausible. Instead, the goal should be to encourage sustainable palm oil production.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe recommend governments require consumer goods companies and retailers to buy identity-preserved certified palm oil, which can be traced back to the individual plantation. If national targets must be met with identity-preserved certified palm oil, demand for it will increase. It will also enable unsustainable practices to be uncovered more easily.<\/p>\n
\u201cCompanies should also publicly disclose their palm oil suppliers. This will help consumers know if they\u2019re sourcing their palm oil from growers who use best practices.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe believe these measures could promote a more rapid move towards sustainable palm oil consumption, and higher levels of accountability throughout the supply chain.\u201d<\/p>\n