Any uptake in electric vehicle use must be mirrored by the development of clean energy grids to mitigate both climate change and air pollution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That is the key finding of a new study by researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, and Stanford University, California.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Published today in the IOP Publishing journal Environmental Research Letters, the study examined the most beneficial vehicle fuel technology for transportation in the US, and the trade-off between decarbonisation (climate) and air pollution (health) mitigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Co-author Professor In\u00eas M L Azevedo, from Stanford University, said: \u201cThe transportation sector is the largest contributor to CO2 emissions in the United States. Its impact on health and the environment is also significant. Greenhouse gases and criteria air pollutants affect different places in different ways. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
“Greenhouse gases disperse globally, stay in the atmosphere for decades to centuries, and their effects differ globally, but such an effect does not depend on where the emissions originate. Criteria pollutants have much shorter lifespans, and their effects depend on where the emissions occur.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The study estimated the life cycle monetized damages from greenhouse gas emissions and criteria air pollutant emissions for passenger cars, SUVs, and transit buses in the US. It looked at vehicles powered by four different fuel types \u2013 gasoline, diesel, CNG, and grid electricity \u2013 paired with three vehicle technologies: internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and battery electric vehicles (BEVs).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It used a marginal damage approach to estimate climate change monetized damages associated with greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O) and health and environmental monetised damages caused by criteria air pollutants (SO2, NOx, CO, PM2.5, and VOCs).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Co-author Dr. Fan Tong, from the Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory, said: \u201cWe found vehicle electrification has substantial potential to reduce climate change damages and air pollution damages. With the 2014 electricity grid, vehicle electrification can already reduce climate change damages compared to conventional petroleum vehicles on the west coast and New England.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHowever, in some locations, battery-electric vehicles can lead to much higher air pollution damages than conventional gasoline\/diesel vehicles. This occurs in regions where coal is still prevalent (such as Midwest and Southeast).\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cEven in US regions with relatively clean electricity grids (such as the west coast and New England), battery electric vehicles can only partially reduce air pollution damages. Our results highlight the importance of continually cleaning and decarbonising electricity grids, such as with increased amounts of renewable energy technologies and nuclear power, as well as improving vehicle efficiency. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
“A clean electricity grid with near-zero emissions not only benefits the electricity sector and traditional electricity consumers such as buildings but also becomes increasingly crucial for a sustainable transportation future.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n