Home / News, Views and Opinion / Solvay Additive Manufacturing Cup: winners announced

Solvay Additive Manufacturing Cup: winners announced

Solvay announces the winners of its Additive Manufacturing Cup.

Launched last October, the competition invited university students from around the globe to demonstrate their aptitude for additive manufacturing by fabricating complex polymer shapes with the company’s KetaSpire polyetheretherketone (PEEK) AM filament.

The first-, second- and third-place winners were selected from over 30 teams submitting entries from three continents and 13 countries.



All competitors were required to replicate the same predetermined shapes from KetaSpire PEEK AM filament, including a 3D-printed Solvay logo.

Solvay Additive Manufacturing Cup: winners announced
The ePEEK team’s winning entry exhibited an exceptional tensile strength of 80MPa in the z-axis, which is similar to injection molded parts. Illustration: Solvay

However, each team was permitted to modify their 3D-printing equipment, print parameters and the printing paths.

Submissions were evaluated for mechanical stability and aesthetic qualities by an international panel of industry leaders in polymer technology, design and additive manufacturing.

Winning first place was the ePEEK team from Arts et Métiers ParisTech in France.

In addition to submitting a very well-fabricated Solvay logo, the ePEEK team earned the highest honours for 3D printing PEEK parts that exhibited an exceptional tensile strength of 80MPa in the z-axis, a performance similar to injection moulding.

In second place, the Jugao team from Xi’an Jiaotong University in China earned high honours for 3D printing the most aesthetic Solvay logo using KetaSpire PEEK AM filament.

In third place, the Chloé Devillard team from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 in France demonstrated outstanding creativity and innovation in resolving the technical challenges of printing tensile specimen in the z-axis without any support material.

“The Solvay AM Cup sought to explore the potential of 3D-printable KetaSpire PEEK AM filament by placing it in the hands of creative design and engineering students with a passion for testing the latest technologies,” said Stéphane Jéol, president of the AM Cup Jury and technology manager for Solvay’s global Specialty Polymers business unit.

“We were thrilled with the results. The winners exemplified the AM Cup challenge by pushing the capabilities of additive manufacturing to produce a 3D-printed PEEK part with a tensile strength rivaling that of an injection moulded part.”

Solvay’s expansion into additive manufacturing is rooted in the business’s global leadership in specialty polymers, which offer exceptional, long-lasting, performance for demanding applications in automotive, aerospace, healthcare and other markets.

The company’s additive manufacturing solutions are helping expand the application space for 3D-printed parts, offering more design freedom and increasing material efficiency.

The winners received first, second and third prizes of ten, five and three thousand euros respectively to be used for academic, entrepreneurial or societal purposes.

Solvay will display the winning entries of its AM Cup and share other announcements at booth #1924 during the upcoming RAPID + TCT event in Fort Worth, Tex. from April 24th to 26th.

The ePEEK team from Arts et Métiers ParisTech surpassed over 30 competitors in Solvay’s international Additive Manufacturing Cup competition.

The contest challenged teams of university students from around the globe to demonstrate their aptitude for 3D printing by fabricating complex polymer shapes with Solvay’s KetaSpire PEEK filament.

Check Also

Bio-based products drive industrial disruption

The principles of reduce, reuse, and recycle have turned the focus into exploring bio-based products …

UPDATE: UAE power mix will continue to be dominated by thermal power in next decade

Please note this story, originally published on 17th April 2024, has now been updated by …

Three layers of predictive maintenance

The key difference between preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance is that the latter means completing …